AM I A MEMBER OR NOT?
By Linda Elder, Membership Chair
3½ YEARS OF BPA NEWSLETTER ARTICLES ON
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
By Patrick Muffler, Chair, Emergency Preparation
SENIOR UPDATE - FALL 2006
By Mary Jane Leon, Chair
Fifth Annual BP Neighborhood Holiday Party and
Donkey Parade
By Don Anderson
WHAT WAS GOING ON IN BARRON PARK IN...19X6?
By Doug Graham, Barron Park Historian
KID'S KORNER
By Linda Lui
A CONSIDERATION ON BPA TERM LIMITS
By Doug Moran (BPA President)
HOW THE BPA STACKS UP
By Doug Moran
IDEAS WANTED NEW BPA ACTIVITIES
HELP SUPPORT THE BARRON PARK DONKEYS!
TOXICS UPDATE
By Doug Moran
PREPARING FOR BIRD FLU [public mtgs.
announcement]
By Doug Moran
Balance of Housing with Commercial/Retail
Land use decisions are at the core of city governance, a situation
that surprises many people who become involved thinking that they
will focus on other aspects. Land use decisions involve what sorts of
development will be allowed at what locations, and how dense that
development will be. Traffic and congestion are an obvious
side-effect of these decisions. And the city's budget is largely
determined by land-use decisions: It determines the amounts of
different types of income (property tax, sales tax and other fees),
but also the demands for services (police, fire, streets, ...).
The City is finally paying attention to the issue of the balance between commercial especially retail and housing. However, this came about as a result of many years of advocacy by residents, and without continuing pressure, the City Council could slip back into favoring housing for available parcels. Several major decisions are scheduled for this fall and winter (Zoning Ordinance Update) information will be distributed to the email list.
Several members of Council are strongly inclined to let developers decide how best to develop properties, and for the foreseeable future, that means conversion to higher-density housing. Several other members of Council are philosophically inclined to build more high-density housing whenever the opportunity presents itself, but are responsive to reasoned arguments about balance. Together, these two categories constitute a majority of Council.
Comments to Council by residents at the time of important votes is critical because Council members otherwise unconsciously succumb to the belief that the opinions of their circle of acquaintances is roughly representative of the city as a whole. An example: One veteran Council member a routine supporter of the developers has repeatedly characterized the concern about this balance as "a fad" and saying that just 2-3 years ago residents strongly supported building large amount of high-density housing. However, this has been a persistent issue for over a decade. For example, in the early 1990's, the principles of balance were a key component of the Comprehensive Plan from which zoning flows and one of the featured workshops addressed the problems of the imbalances in the south El Camino corridor created by the previous Comprehensive Plan. In 2002, residents filled Council Chambers to oppose a Staff proposal to convert much of the commercial zoning along El Camino to housing. In 2003, Council approved a 6-month moratorium on development in the Charleston-Arastradero corridor prompted by the neighborhood associations, the then-new Planning Director Steve Emslie recognized that the cumulative effects of the anticipated housing development exceeded what the City had planned for.
So that you can make your opinions and concerns known to Council members either through e-mail or appearing at Council meetings I intend to continue to distribute information about these issues on the BPA-News email list. The idea of surveying the neighborhood and presenting the results to the Council has come up repeatedly from both residents and Board members but the logistics have made it impractical: A meaningful survey requires both a carefully crafted set of questions and informed participants. Staff recommendations become public roughly 75 hours (3+ days) before the Council meeting, and often include substantial and significant changes from earlier drafts. There is just too much to do in too little time.
Relation of Staff and Council
Most residents don't realize that the City Staff does not work for
the City Council Staff works for the City Manager who is
appointed by the City Council (called a Strong City Manager
form of government). In an analogy to the corporate world, Council is
the board of directors and the City Manager is the CEO (Chief
Executive Officer). Council questions and requests go to the City
Manager, who then decides whether and how they will be dealt with by
Staff.
Example: Council designated Emergency Preparedness as a Top 3
priority for this year, but the City Manager, and hence Staff, has
dragged their heels (Patrick Muffler's article reflects some of that
frustration).
Example: The City Manager is widely viewed as dragging his heels on improving the City's revenue. He rebuffed Council's attempt to add an Economic Development specialist position to Staff. His report to Council on how to improve revenues was roundly criticized as inadequate and unimaginative. During the Staff discussion of the future of the current commercial area between Page Mill and Lambert (centered on Fry's), the effects of converting this area from businesses to housing was ruled irrelevant to the considerations (Council rejected part of this).
Example: In a discussion of a potential reorganization of the Planning Department, the City Manager failed to provide a credible rationale for his proposal and brushed aside reasonable questions and concerns. After a heated session, the City Manager relented, but I described his behavior as "open contempt" for Council. Aside: Consequently, I was surprised that Council voted to give him a bonus for this year (4-3 with 2 absent). I had anticipated the vote going the other way.
Council members have to deal with far too many issues to have time to develop the necessary expertise on each. And with no support staff of their own, many Council members welcome analyses by community members who have developed expertise on a particular topic. These analyses are especially useful to Council as a supplement to the official Staff report because they can identify and focus on what tendto be the key policy questions as well as critiquing the Staff recommendation.
Under-experienced candidates: The need for such analyses has become more important because people are being elected to Council with far less experience than in previous years. It has become possible to be widely regarded as a serious candidate for Council despite not ever having even watched a single session, much less having participated in a single hearing. In an (unsuccessful) attempt to highlight differences between the candidates, the PAN (Palo Alto Neighborhoods) questionnaire asked Council candidates to provide details of their participation. The value of simply watching these meetings was demonstrated in the Council Candidate debates in 2005: former homeless person Norman Carroll had this experience and consequently outshone most of the "serious candidates" in term of knowledge and depth of understanding of issues facing the City. (Carroll is not to be confused with perennial candidate Victor Frost).
A similar situation exists for appointments to the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC), the second-most important policy body. Some candidates attend their first meeting of the Commission only after finding a question about this on the application form. Others claim to have attended a meeting, but can't remember the date or topic.
I don't expect this situation to change. When discussing candidates with various "opinion leaders," what I commonly hear is that they are "comfortable" with that person because they know him/her from a charitable or civic organization, where they have rendered good service. Discouragingly, the leaders who bemoan this trend are often found among the early backers of inexperienced candidates.
Role of Neighborhood Associations
The neighborhood associations (NAs) have become a major player in
City politics, and have a role that is different from the other
advocacy groups. First, the NAs are not single issue advocacy groups:
This forces them to address many of the tradeoffs that Council will
be considering. Second, the larger NAs distribute background material
and arrange meetings to keep their membership informed on relevant
issues. This selection, filtering, and reorganizing of the material
is analogous to "The best way to learn a subject is to teach it."
Third, by sponsoring and promoting meetings on upcoming issues,
the NAs expose Staff to a broader range of public concerns at earlier
stages in the process a time when it is easier to remedy
problems. Finally, the neighborhood associations as a group have a
pool of expertise and mentoring that can help residents dealing with
new issues.
How you can get involved
There are lots of opportunities to get involved in these issues. For
example, people with skills creating presentations are invaluable
because some of the people with expertise don't have the time,
inclination, or ability to reduce the key information to something
that an interested resident can and will read. As you participate in
such efforts, you pick up expertise by osmosis. I have been involved
in this manner for over a decade, and there are some areas where I
have become an expert and others where I consult with people like Bob
Moss.
Please consider becoming more involved there are a number of big decisions scheduled for the next several years that will have a dramatic impact on the long-term livability of Palo Alto.
Hello Barron Park Association Members. If you received this newsletter you are a member! Thank you for supporting our neighborhood association! We have 421 members so far this membership year. Your membership helps support neighborhood events such as the ever-popular May Fete, our quarterly newsletter, the Holiday Party, and the Welcome Gathering in late summer. I hope that you will attend a BPA event this year or perhaps consider attending a Board Meeting. We are looking for active members and ways to get our members more actively involved.
I had hoped to be able to report upon the city having established the long awaited Task Force on Disaster Preparedness, but as of August there has been yet another delay.
Over 3 ½ years I have written eleven articles and am finding it
harder and harder to find new approaches to things I have said
and that have been said by others many times before.
Not wishing to repeat myself, I'll provide a short synopsis to each
article, in the hope that interested readers will go to the web page
Spring 2003
Summer 2003
Fall 2003
Spring 2004
Summer 2004
Winter 2004-2005
Spring 2005
Winter 2005-2006
Spring 2006
Summer 2006
Save your money and plan to spend it at the Holiday Party this December. Barron Park will have a second annual donkey calendar for 2007. If you missed the first annual, don't worry, as the second will be just as good. The 2006 calendar was produced by Brandy Faulkner, and she already has the photos laid out for the 2007 calendar.
Brandy especially wants to thank all the people who bought the 2006 calendar. Through sales, plus a few subsidies, the calendar brought in almost $500 for the donkeys' fund.
The 2007 calendar will be for sale at Edith Smith's stand at the Holiday Party, along with her silk-screened t-shirts and water colors of the donkeys. Other marketing plans for the calendars will be announced by e-mail as they are developed.
Join us for Lunch
We have had two summer lunches in Bol Park, both great fun. Driftwood
Deli did its usual gourmet sandwiches for us, and the weather
cooperated for both lunches.
The next lunch will be at Dinah's Poolside Restaurant, just behind Trader Vic's on El Camino, at 1 p.m. on Tuesday, October 10. They have lovely poolside dining, but if the weather is not the best for that, we will be eating inside. Put it on your calendar now, so you save the date. After your wonderful lunch, take a minute to admire the koi pond that wanders through the site. This is a real Palo Alto treasure that apparently never gets any publicity.
If you would like to join us for lunch, and are not already on our e-mail or phone list to be notified, call Rosemary Jacobsen, 493-9152.
Jazz at the Elks Lodge Definitely, whether you like to dance or just listen, check out Jazz at the Elks Club. We went during the summer and recommend it. The concerts are the last Sunday of each month, from 1 to 5 p.m. The music is "Big Band," definitely danceable, and the audience is mostly dancers, though listeners like us enjoy it too. We are told that the Elks Club dance floor is especially good, and that is a particular draw for dancers. The fee is $15 for the afternoon. For more information, phone the Elks club at 493-4249, or Ann Burgess at (408) 348-9324. She is the President of the South Bay Traditional Jazz Society, which is responsible for the jazz concerts.
Supporting Local Schools
Our kids may be long gone from the local schools, even our grandkids,
but the future of our neighborhood is in the hands of the kids now in
our schools, and they could use a little financial help from us.
Don't get me started on why schools have to go begging in this
affluent land. This is a family newsletter. Suffice it to say that
there is at least one easy way to give the schools a hand without it
costing you a penny. That program is escrip.
Barron Park School tells us that they took in over $2000 last school
year from this program. Briones School took in a similar amount. It
is as easy as answering a few questions on the escrip web site,
Check it out. The id number for Briones School is 136556404 and for Barron Park School is 137121755. If you don't "do internet", the local librarian can help you register, or ask a neighbor.
Resources
From time to time we will include in this column ways to get
information of particular value to seniors. Today we have:
Donated by Kim and Ken Perlmutter, in memory of their son Joey,* and by other contributors, this table is a jewel. It is scaled for children-but not so low as to be uncomfortable for adults. And, best of all... the table is a mural!
Painted by Morgan Bricca, this table sums up the wonderful country
atmosphere we have in Barron Park. The donkeys, of course, but also
chickens, ducks, geese, wild birds, other animals, and the natural
streams that we are so lucky to have.
Morgan is a well-known muralist who lives in our neighborhood. Her
web site is
*The address for Joey's memorial fund is Joseph's Journey Fund Peninsula Community Foundation 1700 South El Camino Real, Suite 300 San Mateo, CA 94402-3049
Walk with Perry and 'Niner through our neighborhood!
Sing seasonal favorites! Bring your kids and animals!
Saturday, December 18th
Parade: 2:30 p.m. Bol Park Rain or Shine!
Party: 3:15 p.m. Barron Park School
Parade Route:
Meet at Bol Park 2:30 p.m.
Lave Bol Park 2:45 p.m.
Laguna to La Para
La Para to La Donna
La Donna to Barron
Barron to Barron Park School
Refreshments and singing at Barron Park School Multi-Purpose Room 3:15 p.m.
(If you ca bring goodies for the party, please call Don Anderson at 494-8672)
1926 Eighty Years Ago The Jazz Age
Things were pretty quiet in Barron Park in 1926, although probably
some strains of jazz could be heard from Victrola record players from
time to time. Barron Park's second suburban housing development, the
Irven subdivision, was laid out on August 16. Thirty-five lots on
Alta Mesa Avenue and Irven Court were platted, but nobody built a
house there. Elsewhere, 13 houses were built in 1926, bringing the
neighborhood grand total to 45 by the end of the year. Eight of these
were in the original Barron Park subdivision that had been opened for
development the previous year. Most of the neighborhood was being
farmed, with the majority of the land probably either in strawberries
or hayfields. The California Military Academy, a private Boy's School
was occupying the old "Barron" Mansion and 15 landscaped acres
surrounding it surrounding, located where today's Woodland Park tract
exists on Magnolia Avenue and Military Way.
Matadero Avenue had been laid out from The State Highway (now El Camino Real) to the Southern Pacific Railroad and Peninsular Railway that ran side-by-side where the bike path runs through Bol Park today. However, there was no stop on the railway; Neal Station would not be built for another seven years yet. Also, there were no bridges across Matadero Creek. Instead, ramps were cut in the steep walls of the channel and you simply drove or walked through the water to cross. The bridge on Matadero Avenue at Tippawingo and Josina was built in 1929 and the one on Laguna Avenue at the Park was built in 1933. In 1926, Elsa Preminger bought a 1-acre parcel on Matadero above the railroad where the land slopes up a slight hill. Although the Premingers apparently didn't build until 1932, Elsa took photographs of the hayfields on her property and the orchard below. Her photographs give us one of the best known views of our neighborhood in 1926. One of the things she loved about her land was that you could stand by the back fence next to the Stanford property and see San Francisco Bay.
1936 Seventy Years Ago The Great Depression
Two critical events in our history happened in 1936 the Bols
arrived on Roble Ridge, and the Barron Mansion burned down. Cornelis
and Josina Bol emigrated from Holland in 1936, at least partly to
escape the growing menace of Hitler and his Nazi Party across the
border in Germany. Cornelis, a chemist, was offered a research
assistantship at Stanford, where he became the inventor of the
mercury vapor lamp, which is still the brightest artificial light
source in existence. They visited friends on Roble Ridge and Josina
fell in love with the gently rolling, oak-studded knoll along
Matadero Creek. Cornelis became interested in the inadequate water
supply from the local private Emway Water Company, and eventually
took control of it. He and Josina and their older three sons ran and
expanded the company until runaway growth in the neighborhood forced
them to sell to the City in 1953. However, none of this was decisive
in our history. What was decisive was Josina's decision, made after
Cornelis'death, to sell their donkey pasture to the neighborhood at
far-below-market value. This enabled the creation of Bol Park and
changed our landscape forever. The donkeys became cherished symbols
of the neighborhood and have provided fun for at least two
generations of Barron Park Children and their parents.
The second critical event was the destruction, by accidental fire, of the eighty-year-old Victorian house widely known as "The Barron Mansion". As I wrote in the Winter, 2005 edition of this newsletter, "It was a spectacular blaze. Barron Park has never seen anything like it before or since. It went up in a holocaust of flame and smoke that attracted thrill-seekers for miles around. But this wasn't the critical event. What was critical was the lack of response from the Palo Alto Fire Department. As Joe Weiler said in his oral history, "...they did come to the end of the city limits with one of their units...and just sat there. They wouldn't answer the call because...they wouldn't go out of their district." However, Menlo Park, Redwood City, Moffat Naval Air Station and the County all sent units, but it was too late. Many Barron Parkers never forgave the City of Palo Alto for their lack of response and it was a major factor in the bitter opposition against annexation movements for the next thirty years. It is hard to say what our neighborhood would look like today had we annexed in 1946 instead of 1975, but it sure would be different.
1946 Sixty Years Ago The Post-War Era
By the end of 1936 there had been 128 homes in Barron Park. In 1946,
the year ended with 290 homes, but we hadn't seen anything yet.
Barron Park became the target of developers of mass housing for the
returning G.I.s and our largest housing tract, Encina Grande Park,
was platted in 1946, although no houses were built until the
following year. More upscale developments were the La Mata Tract on
part of the old Neal property along Laguna Avenue at the railroad,
and an unnamed subdivision of 16 lots on Manzana Lane.
The big news was the decision of the Palo Alto Unified School District, prodded by Board Chairman and Matadero Avenue resident David Packard, to provide Barron Park with an elementary school of its'own. As I wrote in the Spring, 1995 issue, "Ever since 1926, Barron Park children had attended school in Mayfield, most recently at the old MayfieldSchool, which was located on El Camino between California Avenue and Page Mill Road." The new school site of nearly seven acres had been acquired by the District in 1940 at a cost of $8,654. World War II intervened, but finally the construction decision was made in December, 1946. The school was designed by the locally-famed architect, Birge Clark, and was built in 1948 for about $132,000. For this, we got six classrooms, and Kindergarten and the administrative offices.
1956 Fifty Years Ago The Decade of Growth
The first of the tail fins on new cars and the last year before Elvis
Presley. "I Like Ike" and McCarthyist frenzy won Dwight Eisenhower a
landslide over the hapless second-time loser, dignified and
intellectual Adlai Stevenson. Barron Park was exploding in growth,
with 1,069 houses recorded by the end of the year. Most of the
subdivisions had already been platted in earlier years; the only new
one in 1956 was the Cobb Subdivision of four lots at the end of
Chimalus Avenue.
The Barron Park and Maybelle Improvement Association had been formed
and was highly active under its choleric leader, John J. Silvey. In
December, 1955, Coastal Northern California had been hit by the most
serious flooding of the Twentieth Century. Barron Park was not
excepted; both Barron and Matadero Creeks overflowed badly and there
was much property loss. As a result, the County Flood Control
District (a predecessor to today's Santa Clara Valley Water District)
was considering building a 240-acre-foot flood control reservoir on
Matadero Creek in the Stanford Foothills. The Improvement Association
was in favor of this. It also led the movement to get street lights
installed in Barron Park; on August 27, 1956 Silvey himself pulled
the master switch, located near Loma Vista School (now Juana Briones)
to light up the area.
1966 Forty Years Ago Build-out is Achieved
By 1966, Barron Park was essential built out. Since then, the only
developments have been condominiums on what had been commercial or
agricultural properties along El Camino, and small cul-de-sacs
wherever a lot was big enough to accommodate. In March, the
neighborhood was treated to the spectacle of an eminent domain
condemnation trial when a jury awarded Giacomo Sambuceto $259,000
from the City of Palo Alto for it's taking of 4.4 acres to create
Juana Briones Park.
1966 also saw the adoption, by the County Board of Supervisors, of the Barron Park General Plan. This document was created by the citizens of our neighborhood under the leadership of the renovated Barron Park Association. Led by Dick Placone, a resident of Chimalus Avenue, the General Plan attempted to set policies towards development and land use that would address problems such as conversion of R-1 housing to apartments. The El Camino Strip was being invaded by tawdry and noisy businesses such as muffler shops and adult book stores. The General Plan led to later adoption of special neighborhood-oriented zones to control the kinds of businesses that could locate on our strip.
1976 Thirty Years Ago Our First Full Year in the City
On December 8, 1975, the thirty-year "Cold War on the Peninsula" came
to an end as the remaining core of the original larger Barron Park
neighborhood was finally annexed to Palo Alto. 1976 was a year of
getting used to the feel of having responsive police and fire
departments, of pleading our issues at the City Council with real
standing as voters. It was also a year of nervousness as Barron
Parkers waited to see if the City would renege on its'pre-annexation
election promises to keep hands off our curb-and gutter-less streets
and preserve our semi-rural feel.
The U.S. Bi-Centennial celebration on July 4 was the occasion for the first large public party in the brand-new Bol Park. Hundreds of neighbors attended the picnic, listened to the speeches and enjoyed the new ambiance in the old donkey pasture. Palo Alto celebrated the year by painting fire plugs in interesting ways throughout the neighborhood and the entire city. Villas de Las Plazas was built on the old McElroy Lumber Yard property on El Camino and Los Robles the first of the new condominium developments in the neighborhood. Many Barron Parkers were shocked by the bright blue roof tiles installed in the development.
1986 Twenty Years Ago The Year of Toxics
By the 1980s, some long-ignored chickens had come home to roost in
the Stanford Research Park and its environs including our
neighborhood. In February, well testing showed serious chemical
contamination of most of the deep wells in the neighborhood, a few of
which were still being used for domestic purposes. This situation led
eventually to the neighborhood, under the leadership of the Barron
Park Association, persuading local and state government agencies to
cooperate in a complex and costly groundwater cleanup program that is
nearly finished today.
In April, there was a chemical fire at Varian that stimulated the neighborhood to consider air pollution events as potential toxic threats to our safety. In October, a large Symposium was held under the auspices of the BPA to assess the various toxic threats and develop approaches to deal with them.
Also in 1986, an election was held and the voters passed a Benefit Assessment tax to pay for flood control work on our creeks, which has since been done. We are now protected against the putative "100-Year Flood". On a more mundane level, Barron Park citizens petitioned for and won a traffic signal on El Camino Real at Matadero Avenue. In October, the BPA co-sponsored a celebration with the Women's Heritage Museum, of the installation on La Selva Drive, of a state historical marker honoring Sarah Wallis, the suffragist and community leader who built the Victorian Mansion that later became known as the Barron Mansion.
1996 Ten Years Ago Passages
On February 16, 1996, our beloved neighbor and patroness, Josina Bol
died at the age of 95. She had been an integral part of the
neighborhood as a mother, businesswoman and friend for sixty years.
Although Bol Park was named, at her request, to honor her husband
Cornelis, it could have just as appropriately been named Josina Bol
Park, for she, as much as any other person, made it possible.
In many ways, 1996 seems to be an uncharacteristically quiet year in
our history. The toxics seemed under control, the flood control
project was nearly finished, there were relatively few divisive
land-use issues troubling the neighborhood. The neighborhood was
saddened by the loss of Lommie's restaurant, almost the last of the
old-style roadhouses from the early days, but gladdened to get a
modern new drug store (Walgreen's) in the neighborhood.
What will we be saying about this year of 2006, ten years from now?
[Editor's note: photos are included in the printed edition which is
mailed quarterly to all members, and in the PDF version which
includes all 4-color photos. See URL for PDF files on your "thank you
for joining" online receipt]
[Editor's note: For those of you new to our readership, Linda and her husband,
Abraham, adopted Jamie in China. For past articles from Linda,
including this story, please see
Birthday Parties: Will They Just Grow Up Already?
I hope everyone had a fun and relaxing summer vacation. Ours was fun
but hardly relaxing, at least not for me. It hasn't been for years.
All three of my kids have summer birthdays: mid-June, mid-July and
September 1st. Alex, my eleven year old, has a birthday that
coincides with the last day of school, give or take a day. Although
June can feel like a blizzard of activity, a party at this time seems
to capture the blissful mood of the end of the school year and the
joyful anticipation of summer vacation.
This year we invited his whole classroom to sit in our front patio and watch Mad Science perform their "Fizzy Physics" show. We also ordered a whole lot of pizza. I was a little disappointed in the show: too many defective and uninspired tricks and poor time management. At one point, some kids were escaping to resume their ping pong game and I had to hog call them back so she could finish her act. I did, however, enjoy having another adult in charge of entertainment so I could focus on handling food and drink issues and be available for "behavior management," when needed. And the cotton candy making was a good value as a $35 add-on feature and would probably qualify as the highlight of the show. I welcome any reasonably priced suggestions for next year.
The party ran from 5:00pm to 8:00pm in the evening. At 5:20pm, one boy asked me when the party was starting. I studied my watch and announced with authority that it had already officially started and pointed out the ping pong table in the middle of the garage as evidence. "Nobody wants to play with me, what else you got?" My mind raced as he channeled his unclaimed energy on tearing apart my thoughtful party decorations. "How about a pogo stick?" I quickly offered, as one of my helium mylars floated up, up and away. He took. Who would have guessed that a rusty pogo stick would someday save my sanity? While a mid-June party captures the high of a new season, mid-July competes with month-long summer trips to Maine and/or Canada and/or family reunions at Lake Tahoe. Everyone's summer plans are well under way by this time and party#2 was a bit more problematic for me to put on the calendar. I decided to invite only three of Matthew's (former) classmates from his Kindergarten class and call it a birthday "playdate-party."
Although I had confirmed the date ahead of time with the other parents, I still feared the impact if one or (gasp) two friends couldn't make it at the last minute. My worries proved unnecessary and everyone showed up eager to party. The four boys had a terrific time with our small Toys ëR Us blowup slide-pool in the 95 degree heat. But the time of day that worked well with my 11-year-old didn't pan out quite so well with my 7-year-old. After a hot active day at summer camp, he was already very tired and now, extremely excited: a toxic combination. He was wild-eyed and didn't respond to his name. He didn't seem to hear me at all. A quiet voice in the primitive part of my brain said "learn from this."
In spite of my weariness from my tired wild-child, the concept of a small group party was a good one. With four children, it's large enough to feel festive and yet small enough to allow spontaneous deviations from the plan. While I may forego even the unwrapping of presents at a larger gathering to avoid mayhem, I was able to let Matthew take a few toys out of their boxes and play with them with his friends. True, all of the foam rockets were launched and remain either on our roof or in the tree. And assorted Bionicle joints are strewn all around the house. But they were perhaps as entertaining as the paid performance at party#1 and minus the cost. Not to mention that the kids were physically active and engaged with each other rather than being spectators. And although I was busy from start to finish, I didn't feel the need for "scheduled intervention" with this smaller group.
Another benefit was being able to pile the revelers into my car and cart them all home in one tidy swoop. It felt like a graceful way to end the event for them; the giddy laughter in the car growing quieter with each farewell as another backpack left my trunk. Finally there was only my little Matthew, drunk with happiness, sitting quietly beside me as we returned home in the almost darkness. I glanced at him and his eyes were twinkling thoughtfully at me. He started to say something. Was my middle child finally moved to say something resembling appreciation? "Can I have more pizza when we get home?" Oh well. Later in the evening he asked if we could do a playdate-party again next year. "Sure, sweetie," I smiled, feeling successful. I'll take whatever I can get. I'm a parent.
As I collapsed exhausted in bed that night, my husband Abraham sighed in sympathy, "two down and one to go." As of this writing, Jamie's special day and party#3 is yet to come. But I feel the worst is over since Jamie is still in pre-school and we are still taking the road less stressful: piÒata and cupcakes at school and a small extended-family celebration at home.
But having recently witnessed her brothers'rollicking friends-at-home parties and being the observant child that she is, my easiest gig might be up much sooner then I'd like. Wish me luck.
[Editor's note: please submit funny, interesting, informatative information/articles to the editor].
Note: this article is a personal perspective on this issue and represents part of the Board's discussion.
In 1997, the BPA Board amended the Association Bylaws to make officers who had served two consecutive two-year terms in the same office ineligible for re-election to that office. I voted against that change because of experience in similar organizations. My biggest concerns were about the office of Treasurer and Secretary: Many organizations have problems finding people who can do the job, and once they do, the organization's leadership works hard to retain them. However, I also had concerns about the limits on the President: I was worried that we wouldn't have someone willing and able to become President every four years. This precise situation arose this spring: I reached the end of my two terms as President, but there was no available successor. Consequently, the Board amended the Bylaws to allow terms to be extended in these circumstances.
My experience as President has changed my perspective: I now believe that flexible term limits for the President and consequently Vice President are a good thing, but not for the usual reasons dislodging people who have become ensconced. Instead, BPA presidents are increasingly sucked into an increasing number of City-wide efforts, leaving less and less time for BPA activities. Term limits on the BPA President acknowledge this inevitability, and provide a useful reminder to the Board that the Vice President needs to be actively preparing to be his/her successor.
This problem is actually a compliment to Barron Park: We have an organizational culture and range of expertise that has provided a good training ground.
The Barron Park Association Welcoming Committee welcomes new residents to Barron Park with a thick packet of information brought by one of our 76 volunteers! If you would like to be greeted or would enjoy greeting new neighbors to our community, please contact Welcoming Committee Chair Gwen Luce at 650-224-3670 or email her.
From time to time, I am asked what the BPA could learn from the other neighborhood associations. But first, what the other neighborhoods think the BPA does particularly well:
Areas where we are good, but don't stand out:
Where do other associations do more than the BPA?
I am considering making this a "living document" so I would appreciate additions and other comments.
The BPA is always looking for good ideas for new activities to benefit the neighborhood. These include social events, service activities and neighborhood improvements. One of the stumbling blocks for people with good ideas was determining if there was enough interest from participants and from people who would help organize it.
To facilitate this process, we would like to gather suggestions that can be combined into an online survey to get feedback from the membership.
Please send your suggestions to me at dmoran@dougmoran.com.
Two years ago, Jean Lythcott and Julie Lythcott-Haims took over the leadership of the May Fete committee and infused it with new ideas and vigor. They also made some much-needed changes in how the event was run so smoothly that it was invisible to most participants.
Unfortunately, they cannot attempt a "three-peat" so we are looking for a new chair (or set of co-chairs). Note that May Fete is not a static event, but one in which elements are constantly being added and pruned, according to the interests and energies of the committee.
Support for Perry and Niner comes completely from the generosity of their neighbors and the community. The donkeys receive no tax dollars, no government funds, no funds from the City of Palo Alto, no grants from any animal welfare or humane organization. They are a part of the neighborhood simply because people who live here care about them and care about continuing this unique opportunity. In return, Perry and Niner provide warmth and joy to those who walk by their pasture; a rural equine experience for suburban children and adults who visit them on Sundays in Bol Park; an opportunity for humane education for children in Barron Park Schools; and a general reaffirmation for all of us of our connection to the natural world.
General farrier and veterinary expenses for the donkeys total about $1,000 a year. Food costs about $600 a year. Funds for the donkeys are managed by Acterra (formerly the Peninsula Conservation Center Foundation), which acts as fiscal agent for the Donkey Project, providing insurance and handling donations and financial affairs. Fees for these administrative services totaled about $200 this past year. All of these expenses are funded solely through donations.
All those who care about Perry and Niner seek to guarantee their proper on-going care and shelter, as well as to ensure that assets will be available for health concerns as the donkeys age. The handlers hope that those generous neighbors who have contributed in the past will consider increasing their support this year. Contributions for the donkey's care may be sent to: The Palo Alto Donkey Project, ACTERRA (Action for a Sustainable Earth), 3921 East Bayshore Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303-4303. The check must be made out to "ACTERRA Palo Alto Donkey Fund," " ACTERRA" must be included.
For further information about making a contribution on behalf of the donkeys, or if you would like information about how to become one of the volunteer donkey handlers, please call Bob Frost, 493-8272 or email him.
On June 28th, Acting Fire Marshal Dan Firth met with residents about concerns about hazardous materials at CPI, and Research Park companies in general. I ran into Firth several days later at City Hall and he commented that he was very pleased by the meeting, that the questions had been good and that there had been no acrimony. I attribute this to the excellent preparation for the meeting by the group of Chimalus neighbors, led by Jeff Dean and Art Liberman. As a result of their research on this issue, the group submitted well-received comments to Palo Alto's Planning and Transportation Commission which is in the process of updating and improving the rules related to hazardous substance storage.
Public Education Meetings:
Sat Oct 21, 9:30-11:00 am, Mitchell Park Community Center
Wed Nov 1, 7:00-8:30 pm, PAUSD Offices, 25 Churchill Ave.
3450 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306 (near Creekside Inn)
(650) 493-4162
James Witt, General Contractor
(650) 494-2041
email James Witt
150 Grant Ave.
650.556.1890
Return to BPA Newsletters Index Page